Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Heap of money out of the National Science and Technology Progress Award-
Heap of money out of the National Science and Technology Progress Award Zhao Qian Xun two decades, China has been the outcome of the level of reward as a measure of the main criteria for scientific research, and completed a variety of awards and achievements of units and individuals directly linked to the economic interests, so the domestic industry has been the high-grade state achievement awards for the important work as their own. At present the national research awards are the types of Natural Science Award, Invention Award and Science and Technology Progress Award categories. In this, the author according to their own personal experience, a brief talk about the National Science and Technology Progress Award for history. where I was a provincial Institute. Over the years, we bred a new crop varieties and have a relatively large area of the promotion. According to our understanding and analysis that has been initially with the results for national awards level. report to the House leadership, immediately aroused attention. School principal leaders of instructions: First, the results as a major achievement to foster the Court to enhance the visibility of the Institute, as the Court has the State for 10 consecutive years without reward; Second, we have instructed the Department of Scientific Research and the team composed of specialized research in the fight for working with the Task Force; third is allocated 100 million homes as a special fund for national achievement award, the Institute also show the corresponding funding as necessary; Fourth, to facilitate national awards for, instructed the Institute for the content of this unit of study related to all integrated into the results, if there ranking officers dispute was coordinated directly by the hospital leadership; five directly by the Institute of come out first prize for scientific and technological progress. According to the instructions of the House leadership, we began a national award for the hard and long process: 1, vigorous publicity has invested more than 50 million in various news media, advocacy, and cost with the results of more than 20 million reward to invite experts and leaders on many occasions to our hospital on-site observation, guidance, and visit the warm reception, the results themselves have a certain level, get all the leaders and experts spoke highly of the rewarded foreshadowed. 2, integrating content into the last 10 years the unit relevant to research, make the results look more substantial and competitive. Although the integration process there have been some controversy, but the House leadership came forward soon after the subsided, did not encounter much resistance. 3, results of identification, including 5 invited to participate in national and provincial results of regular assessment of the 13 experts (three is the Academy of Sciences) results were identified, and relevant departments of the province and the country's divisions level and division-level leadership has invited more than 10. As deliberately chosen a fairly good relationship with our well-known experts as chairman, and in advance by the experts drafting the expert opinion of our own were repeated scrutiny, so The whole process went very smoothly, the results were evaluated as an international leader to achieve our desired objectives. only after the accounts startled us: the identification of 13 experts fee is 26,000 yuan (2,000 yuan / person), more than 10 led . just a 1 day conference, spent about 15 million. 4, the provincial science and technology award for the province because of our unit is the largest Institute, seems to have a 1-2 year received the first prize of scientific and technological progress practice, so the House leadership and technology directly to the leadership and direct management of the Office of the coordination offices, it is easy to get the provincial scientific and technological progress award. this period, various fees and spent more than 30 million. 5, the state achievement awards The reward for access to the province soon after the results were recommended as a key ministries and agencies to declare the national results. involved in all aspects of the national achievement awards, so the whole process is very complex, cost is also quite huge. national awards during the general awards are: material declaration - form of review - Network Assessment - evaluation of professional group meetings - the jury review - publicity - Awards. which network assessment and professional assessment of the most critical group meetings. According to this process, we carried out major work are as follows: The first step: the relationship through all aspects of , got the first time review the list of experts participating in the network. To this end, has spent 10 million; II: The use of all aspects of the relationship and contact with experts in each network assessment, reporting. has spent 15 million element is huge. III: the first time got a list of experts to participate in review meetings, as these experts are mostly academicians, the reach of most people, the main direct contact by our hospital leadership and reporting, has spent more than 20 million dollars. We received a report on these contacts and good results. Many experts said the spot is a major outcome of this project; even very rigorous academic experts, because most are not familiar with this particular crop, but also to express our report in their favor assessment. on the basis of the above work, our group has undertaken a number of external work, spent more than 20 million. In the fight for the process, teacher-student relationship, student relations, and even the old leadership relations between the villagers and so came back to handy. After 2 years of hard work, we do so to obtain a National Science and Technology Progress Award. as group members, we know that the actual level of achievement won the second prize has been satisfactory, but the House leadership but did not satisfied, because we report to the House leadership has claimed that the results when fully equipped with first prize level. House leadership concluded that topic moderator, I had the honor to Beijing to receive the award, institutions have 20 million reward me, but I do not have the nerve pocketed, but took 5 million to help us, said the leaders were, in particular, out of 50000 That element of the research results are integrated into the outcome of the comparison and ranking by a young colleagues after the compensation. get this prize, which was rated as advanced units of the collective, I was as model workers, academic leaders , outstanding contributions of experts, deputies, expert advisory members, Dr. instructors. At present the yard is a Fellow of the signs of my packaging, I am also the preparation in accordance with the instructions of the leadership to apply the second national awards. But As a science and technology workers, when recalled for the entire award process to feel psychological discomfort. The results of the research has invested less than 100 million, while incentives for direct investment has more than 200 million, though it is not their own money, but scientists should do what? famous, I use the convenience of meeting a number of award-winning contact with experts, most of them also and I have a similar experience. and in contact with the reviewers, we also found other completion of the project who are also exposed to these experts, you can guess, the majority of alumni achievements do not come easy. However, this does not make me get any comfort, technology incentives and technological achievements as the country's benefit system, and I even felt that system defects and the sorrow of science and technology workers. and, like most other research, a variety development, the application area and has published articles can be true and complete to complete the evaluation of the results, why must the results Award as the most effective evaluation method? when scientists can focus all efforts on the real scientific innovation? I'm going to be held open that process which is not the responsibility of units and individuals, but also reveal an alternative technology is not only sincere but hope that through this understanding of the true examples of scientific and technological achievements of the existing reward system, the drawbacks of technology, the common call for reform of this system, and promote the development of science and technology.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment