Go to pass it?

 Go to pass it? The other three debates entirely escape my problems are in fact like a giant, if it continues to expand its cardiovascular function will be overwhelmed, society will have to invest huge sums of money for it to pass blood vessels, take heart bridge, while the number of quality was like a group of vibrant small town boy, represents the hope and future. Thank you! (Applause.)

PRESIDENT: Thank Tang Haiyan students! The following students have requested the square cross-examination the second debate summary,UGGs, the time is 1 minute 30 seconds.

square Second Debate: Friends of the debate just the other answer was made three errors. First, the other three are trying to evade the issue; second error is to a static point of view of a dynamic motion, the motion today is about urbanization, rather than the city ah! How does this (Applause.) The other Friends of the focus of debate in the wrong. Friends of the debate the other third error committed, is that urbanization in developing countries can not do the next, only developed countries can make progress, this view is a very large and everyone was discouraged it! Each of the three debates to tell us that the city does not mean the city, but the development of the city does not do one day become the city it? Does the other party that Beijing is only so big today, Beijing will not be able to further develop it? (Applause.) I explain away the other two issues, said the city once again does not mean the city, but the other seems to let us debate the Friends of default, under the urbanization of the human civilization is indeed difficult to bring Rose to promote the spirit, but also conducive to human hair to! The other side of a debate and tell us that Singapore is a city, but I fail to understand, Singapore, how advanced the city will be other debates, as friends have said it? The caller said the expansion and development in Singapore, will move its industries near the island, near the island which does Yuxiang is a kind of evolution brought about by the urbanization progress? (Applause.)

are free people: the debate today, the most critical event that is a word error urbanization and urbanization, will debate each other friends, how you tried to make clear distinction between urban and urbanization of it, your Where is it based on?

anti-free people: the other side just wrong to me plus an error, that is (Applause.) light on your talk Shenkan urbanization in Beijing, when Beijing has been very tired, Beijing is already very heavy burden, you just why Yang boiling soup, of promoting Beijing, Beijing, urbanization, to Beijing bother to learn it?

are free man: I want to give you correct a concept, just said metroplis Friends said the other debates, and not conducive to human development, urbanization, and that I would like to ask each other debate friends, urbanization of Hong Kong from a fishing village into a Pearl of the Orient Pearl of the Orient is not here is not conducive to human development? (Applause.)

anti-free people: Please do not quibble over the other Friends of the debate, or we can develop China, and which human beings can not, there are rural areas outside the city, but there are still 600 million rural surplus labor is the key to the urbanization process, workers in Sichuan, Zhejiang, Tanhua Lang, Anhui, a small nanny and, after North and South, Sichuan army, Army, Northeast Army,Bailey UGG boots, drawn by something, I ask other friends, when they poured into the city's time, you that they can find their colorful dream?

are free people: the other side argue the Friends, we fully recognize the city built a transition period, but there are transitional problems as I have cited examples of the legal system can not represent that it is not conducive to human development, Friends of this debate the other party can not respond to our fishing village into Hong Kong from Pearl of the Orient is not a little example of that, but

go? (

Anti-free people: I'll tell you that Hong Kong's population, but 10 million, while China's population of 1.3 billion, you do for 10 million population development without talking about the development of 1.3 billion people do?

are free men: we suddenly realized, with the other defense is that the Friends are wrong regardless of urbanization, most people thought that the development of power. that I felt strange, since the emergence of a coastal urbanization of 14 development areas, This is the result of urbanization, then ask why these 14 development areas is not conducive to human development, please give us the other defense arguments Friends of it! (Applause.)

anti-free people: the development of urbanization, region is the city you?

are free people: of course does not necessarily represent the city, because, as we have said it is a dynamic process, other friends ask this debate is a little perspective with the dynamic development of static The suspect? (Applause.)

anti-free: you this the educational and cultural level of affordable, competitive employment into alternative employment, they are engaged in dirty, tired, low-weight jobs. I ask each other, their occupation, their lives, whether it is life in urban and rural mental cracks? you can say in this campaign of encircling the cities,bailey UGG boots, the rural areas has been beneficial to the development of young people who do?

are free people: This is the so-called development background, Please do not be among the background of these developments brought about by urbanization, the planning and production to solve the

anti-free people: to solve it? city asphalt is too hard, not step by step, the majority of workers had to take mistakes and misty .1 million migrant workers return home with a personal experience for you, the city singing a song sad song, you hear? You can say that urbanization of rural surplus labor is the correct answer to you?

are free men: we repeatedly asked the three rational urbanization in China from Hong Kong to an instance of the Friends of the other debates but again and again to tell us with the emotional transition the imbalance. As we said earlier, there do to offset the transition period can deny that it is not conducive to human development? this logic is how the other debates inferred friends, ask them to explain to you the Friends of defense is good ? (Applause.) In general, the Friends still owe each other the two of us debate answer, the first example for Hong Kong Pearl of the Orient; the second is for the development of China's coastal areas in 14 examples, ask them to be friendly debate children of people in a free debate and free speech the rest of the time to explain. PRESIDENT: I thank both the freedom of people! their tit for tat dialogue, both gentle and really let us see what we expect idealized debate. Well, the following is free to enter the debate session, the two sides in the debate have total freedom when the 4 minutes. First of all there is, please speak square.

square three debates: First of all ask each other, in the end turned from a fishing port in Hong Kong Pearl of the Orient, How was not conducive to human development?

Opposition: There is a city would be tantamount to urbanization? Now we do we race during the debate, the debate of it? us with lights, it really light of it? each other's logic is really very confusing ah!

square one debate: the other towns and cities have asked what we were, I would argue Friends tell each other, from the town into a city that is the urbanization process, look at other towns today, do not look at the urbanization, it said in the past it? each other to repay it! ask, Pearl of the Orient are not conducive to human development? (Applause.)

Opposition Debate: Will Friends of the other debates, do not follow your logic of this Pearl of the Orient, it is necessary to develop into Guangdong City, Guangdong Province do?

square three debates: the other side is that Hong Kong is not conducive to human development. then let us give up Hong Kong was up?

three debates against side: We are talking about is not conducive to human development, urbanization, not to say that the city simply is not conducive to human development. the other students, you all comes down to saying that there is nothing more than the city to with urbanization, it is nothing more than your logic is that humans already have the knowledge and the economy, then humans are not in a hundred years ago of the knowledge economy to achieve it? (Applause.)

square second debate: I do not understand why the city is conducive to human development, and urbanization is not conducive to human development? this conflict is how to build each other up to! (Applause.)

Opposition: We in debate which has already told you, and only focus on the development was called the urbanization of cities, if we have one or two cities called urbanization, then there is something in this world are ?

square of a debate: the caller said the city does not mean that urbanization, the city is conducive to human development, urbanization is not conducive to human development, then this is not telling us to eat is good for our health, but the process of eating I just is not conducive to health? (Applause.)

Opposition debate: According to the other side to this logic, we all live in a modern, then all modern yet? meal is a good thing, but if you a eat a fat man, and that the body as a whole? (Applause.)

square Second debate: So tell us the other side argued that the Friends. the food is good, but because of fear of stiff, so do it there ate.

Opposition: We are not talking about the delicious food, but meal meal to eat, I eat a meal bowl of rice 1O, 2O bowl of rice, 3O bowl of rice, even if I eat a big bottle of And for that we have to gradually develop urbanization, the development of urbanization regularly, this is the urbanization is conducive to human development. (applause)

three anti-party debate: Despite all the rhetoric or not to engage each other clear distinction between urbanization and urbanization. the other students, I advise you to go back a good check of, I would like to ask the other students, urbanization as a national political, economic, cultural, education center, what is not conducive to human development, how ah?

Opposition: According to the logic of the other party, that is, cities and towns will developed into large cities, large cities and the development of Chengdu, this is a process of ever restless, then the future is the future of the city to the world? ask the other students, you know what the ecological limits? This will give humanity How much harm you?

square second debate: We do not deny that there are some abuses under the urbanization, but these shortcomings do not be resolved through the urbanization of it? friends debate the other party has admitted to us from the village to the town to the city is a whole process of urbanization, they have been asking us what the city were with urbanization, is not that they have got the answer?

Opposition: Your logic is not my side of the logic it! our focus on the development that is to be called urbanization of cities. Since the ecological limits of the other students do not know what, let me tell you. ecological limits is the extent of the biosphere within a certain self-regulating function, but to a certain degree of pollution, when it will cause irreversible ecological damage, and if a city built, as the other students, as again and again to sink into, it would break through ecological limits to human irreversible ecological damage brought about the change. (applause)

square of a debate: argue the other side of Friends, today is to focus on the development of the metropolis, but there are medium-sized city and small city, the other as long as the development of metropolis So, will you also for small and medium How to explain it?

three anti-party debate: the other side and then to correct an error, then it's no medium-sized city, is called the medium-sized cities. the other from Malaysia, should be aware of things in Malaysia According to reports Malaysia's national development, Malaysia has moved from the development into the development of urban-based small and medium urban-based, like the other said, if the urbanization is so good, why do it in Malaysia? (Applause.)

square Second Debate: Is not the small city of urbanization it? what we now call the other side of urbanization is the time to just focus on the development said. I ask the other students, the city as a national political, economic, cultural, education center whether it is harmful to the country?

Opposition Debate: We've told you, urbanization and harmful to humans. I ask you, should be considered when urbanization had not considered the majority of the country it?

square Second Debate: Party have been telling us that urbanization harmful to humans, but did not explain to us why the urbanization harmful to humans. and then ask other friends argue, if the urbanization inside the political, economic, cultural to teach all to diverge, then the United States today is not the White House would have gone into the country? (Applause.)

three anti-party debate: Let me tell you how urbanization is harmful to humans . U.S. economist Lipton theory in the city tend to have long pointed out that the urbanization of the country when formulating economic policies tend to have large cities,UGG boots, which will inevitably lead to other urban and rural poor.'s further expansion. I ask each other, you say urbanization of rural people how to eliminate the dual structure it?

square one debate: the United States, a well-known urban experts have told us that urbanization can make our culture can continue to develop, there are other How to explain?

Opposition: the other students, your theory may be some out of date? I already told you that you are against the concept of urbanization?

square of a debate: Friends of the other debate, against the spread of urbanization, urbanization is a kind of do not confuse each other.

Opposition Debate: Debate each other friends made a mistake, is to reverse urbanization, industry and capital to small and medium cities cities and towns, it is called urbanization, rather than urbanization. (applause)

square Second Debate: What is something inside of urbanization which transfer to the town, is not to develop another city is it? (applause )

Opposition: According to the logic of the other side, urbanization is the inverse of urbanization, then the logic of which is equivalent to reverse the anti-thesis of the proposition, the soccer offside which is equivalent to the offside, we do not the introduction of the computer to discuss what the referee, what personal referees, as it is simply a mass of mess wow!

square three debates: the other side is always with us about ecological limits, then I ask other students how to be environmental pollution problems do not need all kinds of urbanization brought about planning and production to solve it?

three anti-party debate: environmental pollution, of course, need to be resolved through the town. I ask the other students, Malaysia's largest river flows through Which city? (time to)

square Second Debate: Thank you, Friends of the other debates we have finally admitted to the problem of environmental pollution can be solved through urbanization, so that our country is through the Kuala Lumpur to resolve urbanization problems ah!

square one debate: the other side has been no way to answer our question, is the city became political, economic, cultural, education centers, and how it is not conducive to human development